The persistent and troubling problem of food insecurity, defined as households having insufficient resources to provide adequate food, has far-reaching implications for Americans’ health and economic security. Rates of food insecurity spiked during the Great Recession and have not returned to pre-recession levels.
Food insecurity impacts a wide range of Americans, including the struggling lower-middle class. In 2014, almost one in seven households reported food insecurity. Throughout the country, over 15 million children live in households that experience food insecurity. Additionally, many observers may find the following statistics contrary to conventional understanding of food insecurity in America:
Nearly half of food-insecure households with children are headed by a married couple and the overwhelming majority of food-insecure families with children are working families.
Fortunately, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as food stamps, reduces food insecurity and very low food security, lifts millions of Americans out of poverty, and improves the health and financial well-being of program participants in the near- and long-term.
In a recent study of the introduction of SNAP, Hamilton Project director Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach found that access to the program allowed children to invest more in their own education. The program not only improved high school graduation rates, but also had long-lasting positive impacts, including better health outcomes and, for women, greater economic self-sufficiency. Another recent study found that SNAP participation reduced the likelihood that a household experienced other forms of economic hardship, such as falling behind on housing expenses (rent or mortgage payments), utility bills, or forgoing a necessary visit for medical care.
Furthermore, SNAP is highly responsive to the business cycle, serving as an effective macroeconomic stabilizer. A previously released Hamilton Project economic analysis shows that SNAP’s responsiveness to fluctuations in the economic situation has increased over time: when unemployment rates rose in the Great Recession, take-up of SNAP was higher than in any post-1970 recession. As the figure below shows, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) included a SNAP benefit increase. At the height of the Great Recession, this nominal SNAP benefit increase coincided with a reduction in the rate of very low food security—that is, the share of households that suffered one or more periods during which food intake of household members was reduced or normal eating patterns were disrupted—among households with children.
A tenet of The Hamilton Project’s economic strategy is that long-term prosperity is achieved through policies that foster sustainable economic growth and enhance individual economic security. Reducing food insecurity through investments in nutrition programs and the safety net plays an important role in advancing individual economic security.