Skip to Main Content
The Hamilton Project
The Hamilton Project
  • Newsletter Signup
  • News and Commentary
  • Brookings
  • Topics
    • Economic Security & Inequality
    • Education
    • Effective Government
    • Employment & Wages
    • Energy & Climate
    • Health Care
    • Healthy Economy
    • Housing & Infrastructure
    • Immigration
    • Recessions
    • Social Insurance
    • Tax Policy & Budget
    • Technology & Innovation
  • Publications
  • Data
  • Events
  • About
    • Mission and Vision
    • Advisory Council
    • Staff
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Search
All News
Share
[addthis tool="addthis_inline_share_toolbox"]
Commentary

Jay Shambaugh testifies on the impact of proposed work requirements for SNAP recipients

By: Jay Shambaugh
April 3, 2019
Social Insurance

 

Testimony of Jay Shambaugh

Chairwoman Fudge, Ranking Member Johnson, and Members of the Committee –

Thank you for inviting me to join this important discussion regarding the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Proposed Rule: SNAP Requirements for Able-Bodied Adults Without Dependents.

My name is Jay Shambaugh, and I serve as the Director of The Hamilton Project and as a Senior Fellow in Economic Studies at the Brookings Institution and a Professor of Economics at George Washington University. I am here to provide evidence regarding SNAP, a program that lifts millions of Americans out of poverty, reduces food insecurity, improves economic security, and acts as a crucial fiscal automatic stabilizer.

Research shows that SNAP is a highly effective program. It also shows that work requirements keep people out of the SNAP program but have little or no impact on work. The proposed rule takes a number of steps to reduce the flexibility of states in using waivers or exemptions from work requirements. The USDA’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and its Regulatory Impact Analysis are correct that the changes will reduce SNAP participation, but provide no evidence that the changes would increase employment.

Agencies, such as USDA, may issue regulations when there is a compelling public need and when the benefits outweigh the costs. In my remaining time, I would like to highlight three areas where the proposed rule fails to meet this standard…

Read the full testimony

Watch the HearingFull Testimonypdf

Related Links

Work requirements and safety net programs
Workers could lose SNAP benefits under Trump’s proposed rule

Contact

Media Inquiries

Este Griffith
Phone: 202-238-3088
[email protected]

Authors

Jay Shambaugh

Under Secretary for International Affairs, U.S. Department of the Treasury

Related Content

Shopping cart on curb
Data

SNAP payment error rates by state, FY 2003–24

Shopping cart on curb
Paper

Proposed SNAP cuts would permanently undermine recession readiness and responsiveness

Shopping cart on curb
Data

Assessing SNAP work requirement waiver policies

Contact Us

THP Newsletter

Stay up to date with The Hamilton Project by signing up to receive the newsletter.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Copyright 2025 The Brookings Institution. Terms and Conditions. Build by Social Driver.

  • Topics
    • Economic Security & Inequality
    • Education
    • Effective Government
    • Employment & Wages
    • Energy & Climate
    • Health Care
    • Healthy Economy
    • Housing & Infrastructure
    • Immigration
    • Recessions
    • Social Insurance
    • Tax Policy & Budget
    • Technology & Innovation
  • Publications
  • Data
  • Events
  • About
    • Mission and Vision
    • Advisory Council
    • Staff
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Newsletter Signup
  • News and Commentary
  • Brookings
Close Modal
Close Modal
close modal icon
This website uses cookies to offer you a better experience. By continuing on the site, you agree to the use of cookies.Agree