Skip to Main Content
The Hamilton Project
The Hamilton Project
  • Newsletter Signup
  • News and Commentary
  • Brookings
  • Topics
    • Economic Security & Inequality
    • Education
    • Effective Government
    • Employment & Wages
    • Energy & Climate
    • Health Care
    • Healthy Economy
    • Housing & Infrastructure
    • Immigration
    • Recessions
    • Social Insurance
    • Tax Policy & Budget
    • Technology & Innovation
  • Publications
  • Data
  • Events
  • About
    • Mission and Vision
    • Advisory Council
    • Staff
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Search
All Publications
Share
[addthis tool="addthis_inline_share_toolbox"]
Policy Proposals

Improving TANF’s countercyclicality through increased basic assistance and subsidized jobs

By: Indivar Dutta-Gupta
May 16, 2019
Employment & Wages, Social Insurance
Full Paper

 

The Problem

The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program (TANF) suffers from widely recognized and profound structural flaws—most notably, its inability to expand and contract with need. In addition, excessive flexibility allowed for types of state TANF spending has led states to use TANF funds in ways that are not well-targeted to support the basic living standards of families with the greatest need.

The Proposal

Indivar Dutta-Gupta proposes that policymakers immediately establish a TANF Community and Family Stabilization Program to meet families’ basic needs while also acting as an automatic economic stabilizer. As an intermediate step to broader TANF reform, this program would offer a generous and open-ended match to state provision of two specific types of support.

  1. Basic assistance: Cash and vouchers, including emergency assistance, to meet the basic needs of families during recessions. This assistance will stimulate the economy, reduce immediate hardship, and likely lead to longer-term benefits for affected children.
  2. Subsidized jobs with wraparound support services: Programs, administered throughout the business cycle, that offset the cost of employers hiring workers who likely would have not been otherwise hired (for positions that likely would not have otherwise existed). These programs would also partially match state spending on related job preparation and training as well as on wraparound support services.
Full Paperpdf

Related Links

Recession Ready: Fiscal policies to stabilize the American economy

Contact

Media Inquiries

Marie Wilken
Phone: (202) 540-7738
[email protected]

Author

Indivar Dutta-Gupta

Co-Executive Director, Georgetown Center on Poverty and Inequality

Related Content

the letter H, centered
News

Provision in GOP budget bill puts millions at risk of losing SNAP benefits

Service worker holds notepad
Paper

Work requirements penalize workers in volatile occupations

Work permit applications suggest prior immigration is still pushing up labor supply—for now
Data

Tracking work permit applications among eligible immigrants

Contact Us

THP Newsletter

Stay up to date with The Hamilton Project by signing up to receive the newsletter.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Copyright 2025 The Brookings Institution. Terms and Conditions. Build by Social Driver.

  • Topics
    • Economic Security & Inequality
    • Education
    • Effective Government
    • Employment & Wages
    • Energy & Climate
    • Health Care
    • Healthy Economy
    • Housing & Infrastructure
    • Immigration
    • Recessions
    • Social Insurance
    • Tax Policy & Budget
    • Technology & Innovation
  • Publications
  • Data
  • Events
  • About
    • Mission and Vision
    • Advisory Council
    • Staff
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Newsletter Signup
  • News and Commentary
  • Brookings
Close Modal
Close Modal
close modal icon
This website uses cookies to offer you a better experience. By continuing on the site, you agree to the use of cookies.Agree