Skip to Main Content
The Hamilton Project
The Hamilton Project
  • Newsletter Signup
  • News and Commentary
  • Brookings
  • Topics
    • Economic Security & Inequality
    • Education
    • Effective Government
    • Employment & Wages
    • Energy & Climate
    • Health Care
    • Healthy Economy
    • Housing & Infrastructure
    • Immigration
    • Recessions
    • Social Insurance
    • Tax Policy & Budget
    • Technology & Innovation
  • Publications
  • Data
  • Events
  • About
    • Mission and Vision
    • Advisory Council
    • Staff
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Search
All Publications
Share
[addthis tool="addthis_inline_share_toolbox"]
Policy Proposals

Supporting low-income workers through refundable child-care credits

By: James P. Ziliak
June 2, 2014
Employment & Wages, Social Insurance
Full Policy Memo

 

This proposal is chapter ten of The Hamilton Project’s Policies to Address Poverty in America, and a segment in Improving Safety Net and Work Support.
Download the full eBook»

Introduction

Economic self-sufficiency through labor market work for low-income families, especially those headed by a single mother, formed a fundamental tenet of both the 1993 expansion in the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and the 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (aka welfare reform). While both reforms have been credited with expanding employment of single mothers in the years immediately following implementation (Grogger 2003; Meyer and Rosenbaum 2001), employment rates of mothers with dependent children have been on a steady decline over the past decade, leaving many families unable to make ends meet (Blank and Kovak 2008; Bollinger, Gonzalez, and Ziliak 2009; Fox et al. 2013).

A key financial challenge facing these families is finding affordable child care. In 2012 the average annual cost for full-day, center-based care of an infant ranged from $4,850 in Mississippi to $16,450 in Massachusetts; for care of a four-year-old, the cross-state range was $4,300 to $12,350 (Child Care Aware of America 2013). As a fraction of average annual earnings among single mothers with children under the age of five, child-care costs amount to over one-fourth of earnings in Mississippi and over one-third of earnings in Massachusetts. Evidence suggests that children do better in model, center-based care than in informal, home-based care on a host of cognitive and noncognitive measures (Bernal and Keane 2011; Blau and Currie 2006; Morris et al. 2009), and that women respond to reductions in effective child-care prices by increasing their participation in the labor force (Baum 2002; Berger and Black 1992; Kimmel 1995; Tekin 2007).

This policy memo introduces a way to restructure an existing federal child-care tax credit to better incentivize work and improve the financial and child well-being for low-income families. Specifically, I propose converting the Child and Dependent Care Credit (CDCC) from a nonrefundable credit—a credit that cannot exceed the income taxes owed by a family—to a refundable credit—one that can result in a net gain after taxes—that is targeted to low- and middle-income families. Because current law does not limit eligibility for the CDCC based on income, the majority of tax expenditures are spent on those families with annual incomes between $100,000 and $200,000 (Maag 2013). I propose capping eligibility at $70,000 and making the credit a progressive function of income, the age of the child (ages zero to four versus five to twelve), and utilization of certified, licensed care facilities. These reforms, to be implemented at the federal level, will make labor market work more attractive to low-income families by providing much-needed financial relief from the high cost of child care. In addition, by reducing the out-of-pocket cost of care for low-income workers, the reformed credit will enable more families to place children in formal instead of informal care settings.

Full Policy Memopdf

Related Links

Policies to address poverty in America

Contact

Media Inquiries

Marie Wilken
Phone: (202) 540-7738
[email protected]

Author

James P. Ziliak

Gatton Endowed Chair in Microeconomics, Department of Economics, University of Kentucky; Director, Center for Poverty Research, University of Kentucky

Related Content

Work permit applications suggest prior immigration is still pushing up labor supply—for now
Data

Tracking work permit applications among eligible immigrants

Workers look at money representing wages and inflation
Data

Has pay kept up with inflation?

A worker strengthens a safety net on a construction site, reflecting how government safety nets have evolved since 1970, reducing poverty and the share of Americans who don't have health insurance.
Paper

Changes in the safety net over recent decades and their impact

Contact Us

THP Newsletter

Stay up to date with The Hamilton Project by signing up to receive the newsletter.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Copyright 2025 The Brookings Institution. Terms and Conditions. Build by Social Driver.

  • Topics
    • Economic Security & Inequality
    • Education
    • Effective Government
    • Employment & Wages
    • Energy & Climate
    • Health Care
    • Healthy Economy
    • Housing & Infrastructure
    • Immigration
    • Recessions
    • Social Insurance
    • Tax Policy & Budget
    • Technology & Innovation
  • Publications
  • Data
  • Events
  • About
    • Mission and Vision
    • Advisory Council
    • Staff
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Newsletter Signup
  • News and Commentary
  • Brookings
Close Modal
Close Modal
close modal icon
This website uses cookies to offer you a better experience. By continuing on the site, you agree to the use of cookies.Agree