Skip to Main Content
The Hamilton Project
The Hamilton Project
  • Newsletter Signup
  • News and Commentary
  • Brookings
  • Topics
    • Economic Security & Inequality
    • Education
    • Effective Government
    • Employment & Wages
    • Energy & Climate
    • Health Care
    • Healthy Economy
    • Housing & Infrastructure
    • Immigration
    • Recessions
    • Social Insurance
    • Tax Policy & Budget
    • Technology & Innovation
  • Publications
  • Data
  • Events
  • About
    • Mission and Vision
    • Advisory Council
    • Staff
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Search
All Publications
Share
[addthis tool="addthis_inline_share_toolbox"]
Policy Proposals

Supporting work: A proposal for modernizing the US disability insurance system

By: David Autor, Mark Duggan
December 3, 2010
Employment & Wages, Social Insurance
Full Paper

 

The Problem

The existing Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) program is marked by dual wastes: too few resources spent assisting individuals with disabilities to remain employed and too many resources spent supporting unnecessary long-term dependency. Workplaces, societies, and individuals will benefit if individuals with disabilities are encouraged to continue working.

The Proposal

A multi-tiered reform proposal would better support disabled Americans by requiring employers to purchase private disability insurance that would assist workers with work-limiting disabilities to remain in their current jobs or transition to more-suitable jobs through supportive services—such as workplace accommodations, rehabilitation services, and partial income support. At the same time, the reform would provide financial incentives for employers that accommodate workers who become disabled. If disabled individuals cannot engage in gainful employment with these supports, or if they are diagnosed with specific severe conditions, then they would transition onto the existing SSDI system for long-term coverage.


Abstract

The Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) program has failed to support the ongoing employment and economic self-sufficiency of workers with disabilities, leading to rapid growth in program expenditures and declining employment of Americans with disabilities. This proposal offers a blueprint for reversing this needless employment decline and stemming the dramatic growth of the SSDI program. Refocusing the SSDI program toward assisting individuals with disabilities to remain employed, and away from supporting unnecessary long-term dependency, would improve the economic security and well-being of individuals with disabilities, as well as their families, employers, and society at large. It would also slow the growth of the SSDI program and, therefore, improve the long-term solvency of the Social Security system.

A wealthy, compassionate nation should have a fair and efficient disability insurance program that protects workers and their families from poverty and loss of medical care in the event of work-limiting disability. In the United States, the Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) program has played this role since its inception in 1956. Currently providing disability insurance to 152 million nonelderly Americans and paying monthly disability insurance benefits to 8.1 million workers with disabilities, the program has become a crucial piece of the U.S. safety net. Without this protection, the country would be substantially worse off.

However, SSDI is ineffective in assisting workers with disabilities to reach their employment potential or maintain economic self-sufficiency. Instead, the program provides strong incentives to applicants and beneficiaries to remain permanently out of the labor force, and it provides no incentive to employers to implement cost-effective accommodations that enable employees with work limitations to remain on the job. Consequently, too many work-capable individuals involuntarily exit the labor force and apply for, and often receive, SSDI.

When Congress created SSDI in 1956, disability and employability were viewed as mutually exclusive states. As a result, the 1956 law defines disability as the “inability to engage in a substantial gainful activity in the U.S. economy” — in other words, the inability to work. The SSDI program still uses this definition, providing income support and medical benefits exclusively to workers who are out of the labor force and cannot be expected to work in the future, as determined by the Social Security Administration (SSA).

Full PaperpdfPresentation Slidespdf

Related Links

Creating 21st century jobs: Increasing employment and wages for American workers in a changing world
Grading higher education: Giving consumers the information they need
A modern corporate tax

Contact

Media Inquiries

Marie Wilken
Phone: (202) 540-7738
[email protected]

Authors

David Autor

Co-Chair, MIT Task Force on the Work of the Future

Mark Duggan

Professor of Business and Public Policy, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

Related Content

Service worker holds notepad
Paper

Work requirements penalize workers in volatile occupations

Work permit applications suggest prior immigration is still pushing up labor supply—for now
Data

Tracking work permit applications among eligible immigrants

Workers look at money representing wages and inflation
Data

Has pay kept up with inflation?

Contact Us

THP Newsletter

Stay up to date with The Hamilton Project by signing up to receive the newsletter.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Copyright 2025 The Brookings Institution. Terms and Conditions. Build by Social Driver.

  • Topics
    • Economic Security & Inequality
    • Education
    • Effective Government
    • Employment & Wages
    • Energy & Climate
    • Health Care
    • Healthy Economy
    • Housing & Infrastructure
    • Immigration
    • Recessions
    • Social Insurance
    • Tax Policy & Budget
    • Technology & Innovation
  • Publications
  • Data
  • Events
  • About
    • Mission and Vision
    • Advisory Council
    • Staff
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Newsletter Signup
  • News and Commentary
  • Brookings
Close Modal
Close Modal
close modal icon
This website uses cookies to offer you a better experience. By continuing on the site, you agree to the use of cookies.Agree